Australia 2

There is a perception that Australia tests people for HIV with the aim of banning the entry of HIV-positive people as a result of the country’s travel and/or migration restrictions. While the policy rationale for restricting entry to people with HIV is said to be an economic one,1 the perception that Australia bans entry to people living with HIV perpetuates the sentiment that they are not welcome and may increase HIV-related stigma among new migrants.

Migrants may be exposed to health risks before, during and after they leave their countries of origin. The migration journey for HIV-positive migrants in Australia is fraught with barriers that include discrimination, marginalization and lack of knowledge about how to access health services.

There are a range of policy interventions that could be developed to address barriers and the lack of coordination across health care services for migrants, refugees and asylum seekers in Australia.

Barriers to health care access include:

Long wait times for services, especially Emergency Departments visits in public hospitals,
Cost of services, especially for specialist and dental health care,
Navigating the health system,
Lack of interpreters and female physicians, and specialist care
Instances of discrimination,
Other needs, such as income generation, taking precedence, particularly in cases where refugees or migrants are employed in casual or temporary work with no leave provisions.

Australia’s National Strategic Plan 2014-2017 reported that barriers to HIV service included:

Lack of resources,
Stigma and discrimination, and
an inadequate amount of culturally appropriate services and initiatives.
There is a need for HIV messaging and customized testing and treatment options to better meet the needs of persons originating from countries with high HIV prevalence.

Australian health care policy for refugees and asylum seekers is complex and directly tied to immigration policy. Health care policy for refugees who enter the country through the Humanitarian Program is comprehensive; providing refugees access to Medicare, early health assessment, specialized torture and trauma services, and access to the same services as other Australians. Migrants, refugees or asylum seekers who enter Australia through “unauthorized” channels or who enter on a range of visa types are subject to fragmented health care policy. 40% of asylum seekers in Australia have no access to medical care.

In general, policy making on migration and health is developed within silos that often have different goals. For example, increasing foreign labour requirements while imposing restrictions on migrants can negatively impact the health of migrants. Policy coordination across the health, labour and immigration sectors may create policies that address the health and social welfare of migrants in their destination countries.

Australia’s policy response to HIV and migration has been reactive with no coordinated policy or program response. This is largely the result of the poorly understood relationship between HIV and migration, stigma, racism, marginalization, evolving migration policies and labour mobility.

Given that Australia is one of several high income countries experiencing a disproportionate number of new HIV diagnoses among people from high prevalence regions, particularly from sub Saharan Africa and South East Asia, an integrated response across government, community, health services and research is necessary to address this issue.